I found this week's readings extremely illuminating and interesting. I had never before heard f Room 13 and I really like the concept of self-governed student-led initiatives- I would have loved to be part of something like this when I was in school!
Its interesting to see how it took on, and how its managed overall. Collaboration is necessary, and I like how they work in teams rather than as individuals, but it got me thinking about complications arising out of competition and conflict. How do students approach conflicts arising out of the collaborative working? the artist-in-residence is there to supervise, but the article doesn't mention conflict resolution technique.
I had never heard of spiral curriculum and I liked the concept of opening discussion on the "weird" to approaching inquiry and experimentation. I had also never thought of free writing as a means of opening up the mind and getting creative ideas out. The Gude articles definitely helped me in my teaching, and I think I'll be spending this weekend applying this to my own work.
Chapter 1 of the Walker readings had a similar effect on me. I haven't really taught art in a formal setting, going largely by how art was taught to me in school, and tweaking that a bit. The different approaches mentioned and discussed in the Walker reading were interesting and very very helpful.
I want to test these out as well, as much as I can, on myself. I think they give me something to ponder upon.
I'm really interested in how the others in the class approach these, as many of them have more experience in teaching art than I have. Have they used these methods? Were they successful? What would you change or rearrange? How difficult is it to know for sure that what you think an artist meant to do with his or her work is actually the right approach? Furthermore, how does one translate that into activities in class?
I am really looking forward to today's class. :)
Its interesting to see how it took on, and how its managed overall. Collaboration is necessary, and I like how they work in teams rather than as individuals, but it got me thinking about complications arising out of competition and conflict. How do students approach conflicts arising out of the collaborative working? the artist-in-residence is there to supervise, but the article doesn't mention conflict resolution technique.
I had never heard of spiral curriculum and I liked the concept of opening discussion on the "weird" to approaching inquiry and experimentation. I had also never thought of free writing as a means of opening up the mind and getting creative ideas out. The Gude articles definitely helped me in my teaching, and I think I'll be spending this weekend applying this to my own work.
Chapter 1 of the Walker readings had a similar effect on me. I haven't really taught art in a formal setting, going largely by how art was taught to me in school, and tweaking that a bit. The different approaches mentioned and discussed in the Walker reading were interesting and very very helpful.
I want to test these out as well, as much as I can, on myself. I think they give me something to ponder upon.
I'm really interested in how the others in the class approach these, as many of them have more experience in teaching art than I have. Have they used these methods? Were they successful? What would you change or rearrange? How difficult is it to know for sure that what you think an artist meant to do with his or her work is actually the right approach? Furthermore, how does one translate that into activities in class?
I am really looking forward to today's class. :)